Skip to main content

Crypto cards with leveraged trading built in

Highest on our score right now: Hyperbeat Card (4.6/5), MetaMask Card (4.5/5) and Bitpanda Card (4.5/5).

Read this first. Leverage can take the money you were going to spend, and none of the on-chain desks here carries negative-balance protection or an investor-compensation scheme. All 12 keep card money and desk money apart, in separate pots you move funds between by hand, and the issuer says so. On Hyperbeat that transfer is one tap in each direction, and its terms still describe a single wallet, which its own funding guide contradicts. Separate pots limit what a liquidation can reach; they do not make the desk safe. A card being listed here describes what its app contains. It is not a recommendation to trade with it.

Disclosure. Five of these 12 cards carry an affiliate or referral link that pays us if you sign up: Hyperbeat, MetaMask, Tria, whose card the author holds, Ledger and Bitget. The other seven pay us nothing, and the rating that orders this page reads the same formula for all 12.

12 of the 141 cards you can get today put a leveraged trading desk in the same app that issues the card. That is 12 outside the exchange-issued cards, which are excluded here: at an exchange the derivatives desk is the parent business, so finding one tells you nothing. The interesting part is who is behind them: nine of the twelve execute on one venue, Hyperliquid. That exclusion is our judgement call, and it follows the app rather than the brand: Bitget Wallet and BloFin Wallet come from exchange groups, but their wallet apps send perps to Hyperliquid, not to the parent exchange, so they are in. Based, Ledger, MetaMask, Tria, xPortal, Coin98, Hyperbeat, BloFin Wallet and Bitget Wallet are nine front-ends, not nine venues. Seven of them name the venue, though usually in the docs or the terms rather than on the card page; BloFin Wallet and Bitget Wallet do not, and the link comes from the app code and from the venue's own data. Three run their own book: Jupiter, on its own Solana program at up to 250x, Revolut, trading CFDs through a brokerage authorised by the Bank of Lithuania instead of perpetuals on-chain, and Bitpanda, with spot margin up to 10x on crypto (long only) and 20x on stocks.

That nine isn't a surprise on its own: Hyperliquid carries the deepest on-chain perps book, so an app adding a desk routes to the venue that can fill the order. It's the right call each time, and it makes one venue a single point of failure for all nine.

Venue and pot, card by card, because the rows below show neither.
Hyperbeat: Hyperliquid, two pots, with a one-tap transfer each way between them.
Based, MetaMask, Coin98: Hyperliquid, two pots, and the issuer says so.
Tria: Hyperliquid and Decibel, two pots, and the issuer says so.
Bitget Wallet: Hyperliquid and PopDEX, two pots: a separate Perps account and a topped-up card balance.
BloFin Wallet: Hyperliquid, two pots: the card spends a balance the card programme holds.
Revolut: its own brokerage, two pots.
Bitpanda: its own book, two pots: collateral sits in a margin wallet the card cannot spend.
Ledger and xPortal: Hyperliquid, two pots: the card spends an account held by the card partner, not the wallet you trade from. Jupiter: its own Solana program, two pots, since the card balance is managed by the issuing partners.

Headline leverage is a ceiling, and only on the best-supported market. Ledger, BloFin Wallet and Bitget Wallet publish no ceiling of their own. The ceiling is also a price: on Hyperliquid a 40x position pays 0.045% of the position each way, which is 1.8% of your own margin, funding runs about 1.2% of margin a day, and the liquidation threshold behind that 40x is a 1.25% move.

Check the country lists twice. The card and the desk are sold under different ones, and the region shown on each card below is the card's list, not the desk's. Revolut is the widest gap: the account is sold in the UK, all 30 EEA states, Switzerland, the US, Australia, Brazil, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore, while the CFD desk is reachable in the EEA alone. Ledger names five restricted jurisdictions for its desk (the UK, the US, Ontario, France and Belgium) and sells the card in all five, two of them EEA states that a row reading "EEA" hides. Sourcing, balance models and the full rejection list are in the research write-up.

The rating that orders this page scores the cards. It says nothing about the desk behind each one. Leverage ceilings and the per-card sourcing are in the comparison table.

Some cards below link to affiliate partners, and we may earn a commission if you sign up. The order comes from our public score, and partner links play no part in it. Details are in our editorial disclosure.

How to read this list

  • The desk is first-party. The trading screen is a feature of the app you install for the card. A wallet whose dapp browser can reach somebody else's perp DEX does not count, or every wallet would qualify.
  • Leverage, not borrowing. Cards that let you borrow stablecoins against crypto to fund spending are excluded. A loan opens no position and leaves your exposure unchanged, whatever the marketing calls it.
  • Exchange cards sit elsewhere. Binance, Bybit, OKX and the rest run derivatives desks by definition, so listing them here would say nothing. This page is the other direction: consumer wallets that grew a desk.

Cards found 12

Questions about leveraged trading

Which crypto card with leveraged trading is best in 2026?

Of the 12 cards here, the three highest-rated right now are Hyperbeat Card (4.6/5), MetaMask Card (4.5/5; 47 countries) and Bitpanda Card (4.5/5; Eurozone). That is the order of our public score, the same formula for every card. It does not know where you live or which currency you spend in, so check both in each card's row below.

What counts as "trading built in"?

The app you install to use the card has to let you open a leveraged position itself. That means perpetual futures, margin or CFDs, reached from a tab inside the card app. Three things do not count and each one removed real candidates: a dapp browser that can reach a third-party exchange, borrowing stablecoins against your crypto to fund spending, and owning tokenised shares at 1:1 with no leverage available.

Which venue actually executes these trades?

Hyperliquid, for nine of the twelve: Based, Ledger, MetaMask, Tria, xPortal, Coin98, Hyperbeat, BloFin Wallet and Bitget Wallet. Seven of them say so, though usually in the docs or the terms rather than on the card page; BloFin Wallet and Bitget Wallet never name the venue, and the link comes from the shipped app and from the venue's own builder data. An outage or halt there reaches all nine, since they are interfaces onto one order book; only Tria (on Decibel) and Bitget Wallet (on PopDEX) ship a second route. Jupiter, Revolut and Bitpanda trade on their own books: Jupiter on its own Solana program, Revolut through a licensed brokerage, Bitpanda as the lender and contracting party on its spot margin.

Can a bad trade drain the balance my card spends?

On all twelve the issuer documents two distinct balances, and a liquidation takes the margin you moved. The one caveat is Bitpanda stock margin, where its help centre says you may still owe money if the closing proceeds fall short. Three of those are documented through a minimum deposit into the trading account (MetaMask, Coin98, Tria), and Revolut adds a legal separation on top: it says client money is segregated and safeguarded, with up to 20% of its value held on accounts inside Revolut Group entities and the rest with an eligible third party. On Ledger, xPortal and Jupiter the card spends a balance held with the card partner (Ledger's CL account, an EUR e-money account for xPortal, a USD balance managed by Rain or DCS for Jupiter), apart from the self-custody wallet the desk trades from. BloFin Wallet and Bitget Wallet work the same way, with a separate Perps account and a topped-up card balance, and Bitpanda keeps margin collateral in a margin wallet the card cannot spend. Hyperbeat's terms still define card and perps against one wallet, but its own funding guide moves money into a separate trading account first and back out with a Sweep to Card button.

Why are exchange cards like Bybit and OKX not on this list?

Because an exchange running a derivatives desk is not a finding: the card there is an accessory bolted to a trading account. This page tracks the opposite movement: wallets and card apps that added a desk they did not previously have. We do not publish a count of exchange-issued cards, because nothing in our database records issuer type and any figure would be a brand-name guess. The test is the app, not the brand: Bitget Wallet and BloFin Wallet are listed because their wallet apps send perps to Hyperliquid rather than to the parent exchange.

Is the trading desk available everywhere the card is?

No. The region shown on each card below is the card's, and the desk keeps its own list. Revolut is the widest gap here: the account is sold in the UK, all 30 EEA states, Switzerland, the US, Australia, Brazil, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore, and CFDs are reachable in the EEA alone. Ledger names five restricted jurisdictions for its desk (the UK, the US, Ontario, France and Belgium) and sells the card in all five, so a holder in any of them gets a card and no desk; it also writes "including", which leaves the list open-ended. One card failed the test outright and is not on this page: Phantom, whose two lists share no territory at all, set out in the research rejection table.