Comparing Holyheld Card and MetaMask Card on fees, cashback, custody, and where each card is available. All data is current for 2026.
Some cards on this page link to affiliate partners, and we may earn a commission if you sign up. The comparison verdict comes from our public scoring formula either way — read our editorial disclosure.
The short version:
These two are close: MetaMask at 4.2/5 vs Holyheld at 4.1/5. MetaMask has a small lead, but which card works better depends on what you need.
MetaMask Card is the better card here. Zero fixed costs give MetaMask a cost advantage from day one. It works with Apple Pay and Google Pay, which is useful if you pay by phone. However, Holyheld may be better if you prefer self-custody need something it does better.
In short: MetaMask Card (4.2/5) is the stronger option for most people compared to Holyheld Card (4.1/5).
| Features | ![]() Holyheld Card | ![]() MetaMask Card |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual + Physical | Virtual + Physical | |
| Self-custody | Self-custody | |
| Mastercard Prepaid | Mastercard Debit | |
| Classic €29; Limited €99; Metal €199 | Free | |
| Free (€1/mo inactivity fee after 4 months no card use) | Free | |
| 0% within EEA; 2.5% + €1 outside EEA | 0% foreign transaction fees (Mastercard standard rates only) | |
| 0.5-1% USDC cashback (no staking required) | Virtual: 1% mUSD cashback; Metal Card ($199/year): 3% mUSD (first $10K/year, then 1%). Metal: 0% FX fees. | |
| €10000/day | Based on wallet balance and spending caps | |
| €1000/day; €5000/month; €60000/year | Not disclosed | |
| 1200+ cryptocurrencies across 17+ blockchains; manual conversion to EUR required; SEPA in via personal IBAN | USDC, USDT, wETH on Linea network | |
| 30 EEA countries only | USA, EU/EEA, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Switzerland, Uruguay | |
| Get Card | Get Card |